ALEXANDER THE CURSED BY FRAYDON ARYAN
IN THE FOOTSTEPS OF ALEXANDER THE
ACCURSED
Historical writers from past and
present such as Robin Lane Fox’ who
have chosen to write on Alexander, have sought to do so with a racist, warped
and narrow view of world history and civilization. For example, in the opening Chapter
of The Search for Alexander”
by Robin Lane Fox’, we clearly get
his viewpoint and perspective (or lack of) on the subject matter:
Nobody in the world had drama and the
theatre till the Greeks invented them.
Nobody asked a philosophic question. There were no athletics, no
history. The Greeks also invented
politics. Literacy, in most Greek
states was a widely diffused habit, no secret art. Like their statues and sculptures, the
man in its records come immediately to life, lit up by comparison with any
preliterate people than by a common sense grasp that these are men with our own
esteem for honour and gain, slogans and oratory, decency and personal
satire................
In eastern cultures from Egypt, to China, scribes
and doctors merely compile their lists of facts across the centuries. But the Greeks composed arguments and
first explained the pattern of facts by general laws. Scientific thought was born in the Greek
city and its open debates.......
Bolder in their mathematics, the Greeks led
architecture to a simpler harmony.
Above all, they left the world their poets, not
only the great play writers of classical Athens but a score of masters of lyric
verse, and towering over them all a Homer who has left historians of literature
to live with an awkward fact: that the first known poet in the West is still
quite comfortably the best.........
The world of the Greeks did its best to civilize
the Romans. Without it they would
have been even worse. It still
throws down a challenge to us. For
century on either side of Alexander's life exposed truth after truth that would
be lost for over a thousand years
and then often undervalued since.
Men in Greek cities were the first to realize that the earth, for
instance, goes around the sun....”
page 11-12, Chapter 1 THE SEARCH,
The Search for
Alexander’.
By Robin Lane Fox,
Penguin Books, 1980 UK.
The above is a general view
shared and expressed by most writers on Alexander.
It is no surprise that with such
a view, how the historical Alexander disappears from their writings; and the
tradition of falsification and justification for barbarity in the guise of
culture and civilisation is portrayed.
Every statement of the above
quote without exception is false and its root comes from the false history of
the West; from the Greek thieves.
This is stated without prejudice or exaggeration and requires no
justification to those scholars of history who are interested in
TRUTH.
And as for Robin lane Fox; he in
his own words states: My first
large guess work on Alexander’s era”.
Hardly what one would expect from a Western scholar Guess work”.
But in general. there is no value
given to the alternative (i.e. FACTUAL) historical
tradition.
Plays and historical depiction of
Great men of Iran were first recorded in the Iranian Royal Court in the time of
the Sumerians.
The great philosophical thinkers
of all time recorded their thoughts and asked their universal questions such as
(prophet) Zarathustra.
Athletics and sports in general
were established by the Iranians in the times of Rustam.
First recorded history of
antiquity is the Holy Avesta.
Literacy, statues, all had been
created and were deep rooted long before the Greeks needed to establish them,
the civilized and developed world of the Egyptian's Babylonians, Persians,
Indians and Chinese.
Scientific thought was thought of
long before the Greeks and was in practice in Egypt and Iran and China. Long before the Greeks built Cities
to live in or houses to sleep
in.
In fact the Greeks traveled abroad to Egypt, Babylon and Iran to study mathematics, architecture and
astrology.
Every classical architectural
motif or order of the Greeks is a copy of past architectural masterpieces of the
ancient world.
The mathematical equations and
naming of the planets had been done thousands of years before the Greeks by the
Eastern civilizations.
Either the Western historians are
ignorant with self delusion of Western origins or deliberate falsification of
history is their aim. By simply
equating achievements of other countries to Greece; a country of no value or
worth in shaping world history or discoveries.
In fact, Greece at that period of
History was a village and the poorest country by far - not just by wealth; Its people as soon as they could, for a
better standard of life, migrated, as they do to this day.
And more than two hundred years
before Alexander, king of Iran Kourash the Great had brought in a rule of
justice, peace, and freedom to the region uniting culturally diverse World
Empire which Alexander inherited by force.
And three hundred years after
Alexander, the holy Sassanian empire brought harmony, science, music and great
military weapons and architectural inventions to the world. And kept the savage tribes at bay to the
end; even the Romans were thankful of this service and paid Iran for their
work!
In fact if it had not been for
the Greeks, perhaps the Roman’s would not have inherited slavery and
savagery.
The history of Alexander is
enough for any one to learn how to be cruel and inhuman.
Without the Greeks, the Romans
surely would have been better in their conduct. This includes other successive
Western empires and leaders.
In Iran it had not been a
realization that the earth goes around the sun; it had been a known fact. And it was the West and its established
religion that denied the fact and persecuted anyone who thought
otherwise.!
The Greek cities, which is if one
can describe them as cities (since they resembled villages), were too involved
in everyday life, such as shelter, food, self-protection and survival to be
involved in matters of Architecture, and Mathematics, etc.
Herodot is now rightly known as
the liar of history and not it’s father.
The father of all liars in fact
is Herodotus’ and the Greeks, Who out of jealousy associate everything
of greatness, of culture and of civilization to
themselves.
It is with no wonder that today’s
Macedonia is in a cultural war with Greece over its past history. The Greeks on their part are fearful that with Macedonia on the world
map, and it’s recognition by the United Nations, their long, claim over
Alexander being Greek, and the Macedonian language being Greek is coming to an
end. And with it their big lie, and
self-delusion.
All liars are found out eventually, and they must be
held responsible for falsehood and stealing a nation's history, namely Macedonia
in connection with Alexander and more in general the stealing of other national
characters, discoveries, history, culture, etc.
The latter is unforgivable
for they’ have done great
injustice, in wrongly misleading generations and educating the West to a false
past and heritage that is mostly non existent and a myth. It could be argued that Greeks
didn’t do this, at least not alone - but they definitely agreed to perpetuate
the lies.
The sooner the World especially
the West is told the truth and educated to the ancient history of the world and
what part, (if any) the Greeks played,
the better the future of the West will be and the world in
general.
For no longer will they have the
right or justification in treating the rest of the world as Third World’, Barbarian’, Uneducated’, Uncivilized’.
In fact it was such attitudes
passed down by the Greeks in which the world experienced the genocide of more
than fifty million Red Indians by the Western countries namely Spain and Britain
and the mass slavery of Africa and
India, from Alexander the Cursed’
to recent times.
Savagery, guised in religion,
such as Islam or in civilization and culture, such as Greece is more damaging
and harmful to humankind than savage tribes who do not guise their savagery and
do not go into elaborate arguments
for its justification, for reasons of God or civilization.
One
of the greatest men the human race has produced” (inside cover)
......his influence in the development of
the world”
Alexander’s personality were several
features that would fit into the Aristotelian picture of the great souled’ man. Thus he was extremely
generous with his money lavishing it in all directions without regard to the
quantity that was spent”
..such was the sheer force and drive of
his will that there are almost Nietzschlian qualities about his
personality.”
(Page
259)
Alexander the
Great
R.D.Milns
1968 Robert hale
London
Nietzschen
qualities?
Friedrich Nietzche’s (8316
AZ=2403 IE=1844 AD - 8372 AZ=2459 IE=1900 AD) spiritual odyssey through the
world, and his doctrine of the
superman’ and the will to power’
were all based on his hero Zarathustra the prophet of Iran. As written in his
great work Thus Spoke Zarathustra”
(8357 AZ=2444 IE=1885 AD).
In his own words:
What
constitutes the tremendous uniqueness of that Iranian in history. Zarathustra was the first to see in the
struggle between good and evil the actual wheel in the working of things: the
translation of morality into the realm of metaphysics, as force, cause,
end-in-itself, is his work.
........Not only has he had longer and greater
experience here than any other thinker......what is more important is that
Zarathustra is more truthful than any other thinker. His teaching, and his alone, upholds
truthfulness as the supreme virtue.......To tell the truth and to shoot well
with arrows that is the Iranian virtue”
Ecce Homo,
1885.
Philosopher Friedrich
Nietzsche.
For the Greek’s had a sophisticated
style which carried Asia before it.
They brought new competition, objects of a new beauty, technical and
rational innovation and a marvelously nuanced language that made men
literate. The Persians had invented
nothing”.
But the Greeks brought new siege
artillery, new walls and ditches, wider irrigation the theatre, the games and
literate poetry. They first put
howdahs on elephants...........
They
had a national rational geography, mathematics, a view of the heavens and men’s
place in a regular world.”
Page 423
The Search for
Alexander’
by Robin Lane Fox.
Such historians as W.W. Tarn in his book Alexander the Great’, regarded Alexander
as a military genius’ and a political visionary’.
BRUTALITY OF
ALEXANDER
The Macedonians were a people of
primitive, backward community, both socially and
politically.
Alexander was an absolute ruler
and a dictator monarch. Few kings
if any had died of a natural death in Macedonia.
His actions at Thebes, Tyre and
Gaza were savage and cruel beyond belief.
And his treacherous slaughter of the Indian mercenaries at Massaga
unforgivable. In fact his reign
opened and closed with murders. And
he is to be judged a Great’ and a
good man.
The idea that he and his mission
were divinely inspired and divinely protected were spread by Callisthenes
(Aristotle’s nephew) for propaganda purposes. Alexander himself never believed it as
he constantly changed Gods and leadership titles.
ALEXANDER SELF PROCLAMATION OF
GOD-HOOD
At Takht-e-Jamsheed he announced
that he was not Philip's son, but of Dariush; many stories have been written
that he also stated he was the son of Zeus the Greek God, and many other
ridiculous ideas came about in his drunken unbalanced
state.
But one thing is certain and of
importance: he denounced his father and his Macedonian
roots.
For Athens Alexander had sent a
command that he be proclaimed formally as God Son of Zeus
Ammon’.
The Greeks naturally refused this
and stated that they would never see glory for themselves because Alexander only
sought glory for himself. And for no other cause.
For he was an autocratic
megalomaniac, and a bisexual profligate.
Or the fanciful idea that he
followed in the footsteps of Hercules and Dionysus who were imaginary God/heros
of the Greeks has no significance or root in world affairs or
history.
The entire Iranian Empire had
been mapped, and the customs of it people recorded, including neighbouring
countries such as India, and China.
The seas had been discovered with all the Known lands. Therefore Alexander was no discoverer of
new lands or seas, or people.
Unless we view this from the perspective of the Greek/Macedonians who
knew little about the Great world and those countries away from their small
borders.
Alexander's glory was purchased
at the cost of millions dead and maimed.
He brought both hardships to his own country Macedonia and all the rest
of the world.
His way was of pure
conquest. There are no indications
in history that he wished for more.
He had no interest in governing or in the welfare of his
subjects.
The Iranian system of government
was taken over completely by Alexander.
He continued to rule from the
seat of Dariush, and throughout his reign he made no attempt to change the basis
of his rule.
The Iranian nobility, refused to
accept Alexander, and the Greeks
hated him. Alexander's attitudes
was simple towards the Greeks. They
were part of his domain and where they could be held down by means of force and
the imposition of pro-Macedonian governments, these were
used.
Even Thessaly, for a long time
the stronghold of Macedonian influence in Greece, rose in revolt at the king’s
death. And when the Greeks faced great food shortage during the years 330-326 BC
Alexander or his administration did not help to ease the
shortage.
He had no economic policy. The prices of food, clothing and housing
rose steeply, without any rise on wages; Thus, the masses were hard hit. After Alexander's death the gap between
rich and poor also increased drastically.
SPREAD OF HELLENISM AND ATHLETIC
GAMES
In Egypt it is stated by some
that he held athletic contests, this can only reasonably be attributed to the
mundane desire to provide relaxation for his troops as he had already done at
Soli in Cilicia, than to any idea of paving the way for the introduction of
Greek culture. What other form of
entertainment could he have been expected to provide? Sport was not the
invention or sole use of the Greeks,
since Sporting activities and games had been in practice in the Iranian
Empire long before anyone lived in Greece.
Iran has a recorded history of
more than ten thousand years with its great prophet dating back to eight
thousand four hundred and seventy years ago.
Alexander accomplished greater deeds than
any, not only of the kings who had lived before him but also of those who where
to come later down to our time.”
The
most charismatic and heroic king of all times”.
He
had adopted new tactics and created innovative forms of
warfare”.
Alexander the
Great’
John J.
Popovic.
InterNet 1996.
One wonders about these so called
Alexander scholars’ and their
source of education and limited knowledge.
They seem to be void of world history especially the history of countries
that Alexander conquered.
Perhaps ignorance plays an
important part in their argument, for assuming that the Greeks or in this case
especially Alexander was the originator of inventions and tactics of
warfare. They can only attribute to
the uneducated the status of Great’
to Alexander.
Destroying prior sources of
information or disregarding them; one can even today claim great
deeds.
However as once stated, the bigger the lie the easier it is to
believe”. And it is this idea
that the Greeks have used down the ages with the support of scholars’, that puts to shame decent
intellectuals and educated men of history.
The Greeks on the other hand, one
feels slightly sorry for, as for any nation to be empty of great historical
characters, for it to need to invent and fabricate a leader of another country
as it’s own, and in the process to
make a man of evil, great’ and
a heroic’
figure.
When Alexander first entered the
Indus Valley, he thought that the river was the upper Nile, and that it flowed
through a great desert before reaching upper Egypt. Just as he had thought the
Jaxrtes to be the upper Tanais.
The sheer stupidity and ignorance
of geography shows both his
greatness’ and the skill” of
the Greeks who advised him on his route.
Unfounded admiration for
Alexander is shameful, and degrading and his achievements,
imaginary.
The Western understanding of
history in regard to Alexander lacks humanity, and exemplifies an outright
racist attitude.
For Alexander possessing Greek
troops, in no way shows a Greek power or a cause since the Greeks were mainly
mercenary and only had one cause worth fighting for which was always money. The army of Dariush also consisted of
Greeks; I see no one suggesting
that Dariush fought for the spread of Hellenism! .
STORIES ABOUT
ALEXANDER
Greeks invented stories ranging
from the Queen of the Amazons (Caspian region) bedding with Alexander for
thirteen nights in the hope of having a child, to the claim that he conquered
unknown lands-unknown to whom? And
he certainly did not increase the borders of the Iranian Empire, except the
inclusion of Greece. His empire or
power did not surpass that of Iran.
He was calculating and cold
blooded in his use of severe methods throughout his career whether in Greece, or
in the Iranian empire.
He had no concern for his country
or troops.
ALEXANDER, MURDERER OF HIS OWN
FRIENDS
In his own surroundings and rank
he also had opposition. He killed
Philotas (murdered at Fara in 6142 AZ=229 IE=330 BC) for high treason and his
father Parmenio (murdered at Hamadan aged seventy by
Alexander).
And then even his own brother
Cleitus, for suggesting that every man who had helped him such as Philip,
Attalus, Parmenion, had been murdered by him.
Callisthenes, Alexander’s
official chosen historian wrote of his despotism and was later executed in
(Aria) Iran by Alexander. And the
official version withdrawn.
Is this Alexander the Great, God,
Hero, Champion of Western ideals?
And in his own short span of
life, who did he leave his spoils to? To the strongest” he
proclaimed.
The law of the jungle and the
rule of animals followed him to his death.
WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO THE RELIGION OF
GREECE?
What has happened to the great
Gods of Greece, who worships them today?
Even the Romans did not follow Greek Gods, they choose Mithra the Iranian
God and religion. Why has Greece
not produced those so-called Great thinkers and Philosophers and Mathematicians
of the Hakhamanian Period?
IRANIAN
GREATNESS
Yet Iran has till today
proclaimed great geniuses and thinkers and Mathematicians, Physicians and
Architects under the most unsuitable conditions.
Why has nothing been mentioned of
the Great books stolen and translated into Greek and attributed to the
Greeks?
Why has Greece or Macedonia not
produced any more so-called Great men?
Could it be that Greece has not been able to loot a Great Nation’s wealth
and treasures and Knowledge to call it its own?
HOMOSEXUALITY OF
ALEXANDER
It was well known that he was
homosexual and had many lovers such as Hephaistion who is said to have been his
favourite.
Now maybe in 8470 AZ=2557 IE=1998
AD in United Kingdom there is not much read into this, but back than more than
two thousand years ago a homosexual was in that part of the world an abomination
to God.
Naturally if Western historians
wish to continue considering Alexander as Great, then Adolf Hitler’ must have been the
Greatest of them all, since unlike Alexander his heritage did not lie in
murder. His father did not have
several wives, he was not a homosexual nor a bastard. For coming to power he did not need to
murder his father, and was elected to leader by the vote of the people. Unlike
Alexander. The first country he
confronted, he was seen as a liberator (ie. Austria) unlike Alexander who
murdered thousands to enter into Greece.
In fact he was a vegetarian, did not drink or smoke and in coming to
power rebuilt Germany and died in his own country defending his
capital.
Alexander being Great’ needs to be justified, and a
description of his Greatness’
given. Not propaganda stories
written by dubious characters who wrote for money and their lives, and not for
historical record or correctness. I
suggest an in-depth review is needed, and the courage to tell the truth. Repeating a lie, a thousand times, does
not make a truth.
ALEXANDER’S
NAME
Alexander’s name is known
throughout the old world, from Libya to China as The Cursed’, who urged on by an evil
spirit brought havoc, destruction and slaughter into Iran, burned
Takht-e-Jamsheed and the Zarathushtrian scriptures.......... and finally,
self-destroyed, fled to hell where he belonged.
HISTORICAL SOURCES & GREEK
AUTHORS
It should be noted that many
works on Alexander such as the acclaimed Arrian, The Campaigns of Alexander’ wrote his
story over four hundred years after Alexander’s death. And the rest, cannot even name the
correct site for the battle of Alexander and Dariush.
Alexander's Diary and letters are
both said to be Hellenistic
forgeries.
And the sources to which they
choose to glorify Alexander’s role, are all entirely not from Alexander’s
period.
Diodorus, from Agyrium in Sicily
wrote almost three hundred years after Alexander death. Flarius Arrianus commonly known as
Arrian from the Roman province of Bithynia wrote his history four hundred years
later. Junianus Justinus commonly
known as Justin wrote about Alexander five hundred years after. Plutarch from Chaeronia in Boetia more
than five hundred years later.
And many more who should be noted
did in fact state, such as Plutarch, that his account of the life of Alexander
is not a work of history.
Not surprisingly, they disagree
with the location of battles, cities named or the number founded and outright
contradictions to his personality.
For example the number given for the infantry of Dariush ranges from two
hundred thousand from Curtius Rufus to Arrian’s one
million.
All the above authors are also
Greek without exception. The mortal
enemies of ancient Iran.
All the modern scholars sources are one sided and from the enemy camp or from the aggressors perspective.
REASON FOR SUPPORT OF ALEXANDER
BY THE WEST & THE ARABS
It is no wonder that Alexander in
the past was revered by Western leaders and the Arab
hordes.
For the Western leaders, namely
the Romans who were at war with Iran for more than four hundred years, were
unable to defeat their enemy and naturally since none of their successive leaders could break the might
of the Iranian Empire, they saw and
made a hero out of Alexander for destroying the Iranian Empire, which they
wished to do.
Before them, of course, the
Greeks championed him as their own, since their country and culture was always
inferior to that of other neighbouring countries, and especially the Iranian
Empire.
And most importantly they really
had no historical leaders or Empire to speak of, apart from fictitious stories
of heroes and Gods.
As they were to write the books,
instead of the Macedonians, they cleverly thought to make Alexander the
Macedonian, Greek. Although
in their own version of history he is portrayed, contradictorily as the promoter
of Greek civilization, since the moment he entered the Iranian Empire he sought
its customs and the adoption of Iranian culture. The superiority of the Greek civilization
seems to have quickly evaporated, if at all it existed with
Alexander.
The Greeks wished to equate him
with a purpose, namely the cause of Greek civilization, which Alexander never
showed any interest, let alone work in the cause of Hellenism or the spread of
it.
ZUL CARNEIN ( two-horned
prophet”) IN THE KORAN
The latter being the mentioning
of Alexander in the book of the Arabs, the Koran. He is mentioned as a prophet, and a
great person, forerunner to Muhammad,(Muslim commentators have identified
Alexander as the two-horned
prophet”, the Muslim historian, Mohammed ben Jareer Tabari identifies Alexander
with the prophet for all people, the hero in the Koran.) and the first
Muslim? This was clearly a
political and a sociological reason for the Arab masses. The world viewpoint especially among the uncivilized, uneducated Arabs
was that the Iranian Empire from the beginning of creation had been in power and
no power earthly could possibly destroy it. Especially as the might of the Romans
had failed.
Mentioning and reminding the
Arabs of Alexander was to play a major role in convincing the Arab masses that
the Iranian Empire was not invincible and could be conquered and
destroyed.
In that endeavour they were
successful. And in fact followed in
the footsteps of Alexander, in bringing death and destruction.
Interestingly both conquered for
their Gods, as we are led to believe.
Yet the only thing that motivated their armies to go further was Gold,
Silver, Women, the property of others and land to propagate their warped
idea of civilisation, religion, and
nonexistent culture. In all three
they lacked and in fact as history testifies they were against all
three.
NO-LEGACY
Alexander left no legacy. There is no trace of Alexander in
Iran. Yet the names of the Kings of
Iran are still remembered with veneration and admiration and
respect.
THE
WEST
Alexander’s drunkenness, his lack
of self-control erupting into murderous violence, having a harem of three
hundred and sixty five concubines, setting fire to cities and
palaces...............
Is the West so empty of
historical roots and great leaders that it needs to fabricate history and
attribute to Alexander the
characteristics of
philosopher in arms’, God
King’, Noble King’, Hero’, Great virtues’, Champion of Hellenism’, Divine aspirations’. These Qualities of Alexander are
nonexistent.
|
BACK |
TOP OF PAGE |
FORWARD |