SEARCH THIS PAGE FOR: Press the Enter key to start the search.

ALEXANDER THE CURSED BY FRAYDON ARYAN


KING DARIUSH MESSAGE TO ALEXANDER

The King of Iran, Dariush III, wrote to Alexander:



 We command you to withdraw and to return back to the bosom of your mother Olympias, for you are still an impetuous and shameless boy, who in your madness and ignorance have come to Asia with your band of robbers to do mischief.

I therefore send you a whip, a ball, and a bag of Gold.  A whip to train you, a ball so that you may play with boys of your own age and not meddle in the affairs of men.  And the Gold, for expenses, for I have heard that you are poor.  And since I have Gold and abundant as the sun’s light, you need not come to the empire to steal it.”


Alexander's reply:


 You should have not informed me of your vast amount of Gold and silver, because now I will fight harder, until all your possessions are mine.  Nor have called me a thief and a boy, for if you slay me, it would not be a great triumph because you would have slain merely a robber chief.  But if I slay you, it would be said this great king died of a hand of a little Macedonian boy.”



Alexander promised his mercenary army  Gold, Women, and Kingship and all they could get their hands on.  This was the reason they came into the Iranian Empire.  And not notions, civilizing to which they had none.  For they were in truth, the barbarians, and the rest of the world, civilized.

Wherever he went, he left only charred ruins, as his monument.



 I have every day to look at Takht-e-Jamsheed and be reminded that it was built and it was burned.  Alexander came and destroyed an Empire.  He took many things from us, and he gave us nothing.”


Dr. Shahpur Shahbazi,

Director of the Institute of Achamenian studies.

Custodian of Takht-e-Jamsheed.

 


TAKHT-E-JAMSHEED (Persepolis) CAPITAL

At Susa the political capital of the Iranian empire was on route to Takht-e-Jamsheed where the army of Alexander plundered it of fifty thousand talents of silver and the magnificent complex of buildings was put to torch.   Even the resting places of the dead were not safe.   Cyrus tomb (at Pasargadae) was robbed and desecrated by  Macedonian noblemen” (Xenophon, Greek historian).

In January 6142 AZ=229 IE=330 BC the Hakhamanish (Achaemenid) palace at Takht-e-Jamsheed went up in flames by order of Alexander (not without first having the enormous library translated).  Before Takht-e-Jamsheed was taken and destroyed, the local inhabitants living in the city and the surrounding settlements were massacred including women and children.   The ladies were stripped of their jewellery, and the wild looting of royal robes, treasury and  vandalism of the reliefs of palaces statuary ensued.

First he emptied it of treasure, then he set it on Fire.  More than one hundred and twenty thousand talents of silver and eight thousand talents of gold removed.  It is recorded that Alexander needed ten thousand baggage animals and six thousand camels to carry off the loot.  Equivalent to the entire gold reserve of America, Russia and Britain and capable of sustaining Greece for more than two hundred years.

Alexander, the devil incarnate, set out to destroy Takht-e-Jamsheed and its splendor and Greatness.  For it stood out in the world as the only example of unity and greatness within mankind.  Countries of the known world at that time were for the first time in one place, bringing gifts and goodwill every year for the eternal celebrations of the Aryans which was and is  Norooz”.

Even in its ruined state Takht-e-Jamsheed holds its greatness.  No slaves were used in building it.  No other empire in the world can lay claim to this especially that of the Greek/Macedonians.  No slaves in the Iranian Empire in 5972 AZ=59 IE=500 BC.  When we all know the history of Britain, France and America, who had slave trades right up until recent times.

And the Roman’s and Greeks had slaves from their beginning to their end.

Yet Alexander is to be considered as Great, this is what he destroyed.

His readiness to kill, in combat, in passion and in cold blood and to have rebellious communities destroyed and annihilated.  In brief, he had many of the qualities of a savage.

Alexander burned Takht-e-Jamsheed to the ground, thus hoping that the end of the ancient Iranian Empire would result in such an act.


Many treasures taken, many stones broken.

Yet Iranian pride is unbroken.

Many killed, many tortured,

Yet Iranian self-determination is unbroken.

Many stories told, many stories written,

Yet he still remains cursed

Many centuries past, many decades gone,

Yet his ruins remain, for all to see.

The tyrant of history, hero of great books,

Yet he remains evil to his roots.

Barbarian tribes, savages of time,

have come to regard him as good.

Righteous minds, good men of time,

have always known Alexander the accursed.

Poem on Alexander by Fraydon A.


 

ALEXANDER’S ATTACK ON THE RELIGION OF IRAN

It is mentioned that Alexander did not come across the Mobeds (religious leaders) of Iran.

Besides the destruction and burning to the ground of Tahkt-e-Jamsheed which stored the original copy of the sacred holy book (Avesta) of the Iranians, alongside a million other great works of the time, from the sciences to medicine, astrology and geography,  He murdered more than one thousand Dasturs (high priests), Who were guardians of prophet Zarathushtra’s work.  And destroyed the fire temples, sold the inhabitants into slavery and, overall, left more than three million dead.

Is this the mark of Greatness?

Is this the type of leader the West still strives for?

More than five thousand women alone at Takht-e-Jamsheed committed suicide rather than face Alexander's rule.  As had been done by the Marmares on the borders of Lycia finding themselves besieged by the Macedonians, they committed mass suicides (historian Diodorus).

All the elders of the city killed, such an orgy of mass murder and destruction is what civilised nations and cultures of the world do not need.  Alexander is an embarrassment to the history of man.  A Great Robber who destroyed the Iranian empire without putting anything of value in its place.

And for any one else to think other wise is nothing short of evil  itself.

One should speak of and praise men who have advanced and helped humanity and civilisation and not those who sought to destroy it.  Building takes years, destruction takes days to achieve.

Takht-e-Jamsheed took one hundred and sixty four years to build, yet it took Alexander only a day to destroy.  Does he  really deserve to be called  Great’, has the Western society become so immoral that it credits Greatness to such historical characters? .

 

KING KAHSHAYARSHAH (XEREXES) ATTACK ON GREECE

The so-called Greek victory of 5992 AZ=79 IE=480 BC against the Iranian Empire is another myth of history.

The Iranians were not stopped in any way in taking over Greece.  As much as the event resembled the  Gulf War’ and the so-called liberation of Kuwait,  The Americans had no intention of taking over Iraq, but only freeing Kuwait from Iraqi control.  The Iraqis did not defeat the Americans.  Although they might like to think so, as the Greeks do of the above.

The Iranians wanted to free several islands from the constant attack and piracy of the Greeks.  They achieved their ends in securing peace for the lands and stopping the aggression of the Greeks.  The Iranian Empire had no need to take over Greece.  Especially lands of Greeks, that were insignificant and worthless to the Empire.

Reference has been made to some strange history that one hundred and fifty years earlier Athens had been sacked! ? By the Iranians, namely  king Kahshayarshah the Great.  What possible historical precedent is there for one to believe in such a blatant lie?  Something that might have taken place one hundred and fifty years earlier in Athens, that was not even part of Alexander's country Macedonia, is a strange justification for his barbaric destruction of Takht-e-Jamsheed.  So are other stories, which range from him being drunk or not present at the scene.  Such lies are childish and for any educated person to take them as truth is laughable and only shows ignorance of the subject matter  prejudice and  deep-seated’ hatred towards the Iranians.

Which city of the world did the Iranians destroy? All the countries that became part of the Great Iranian Empire had their holy places rebuilt by the wealth of the empire as is mentioned in the Old Testament in relation to Solomans temple in Jerusalem.

No other empire or country or government before the  Hakhamanish empire had treated its captives or occupied countries in such a manner.

Indeed it was such an empire that Alexander attacked, he was no liberator such as Kourash (Cyrus) the Great who freed all the slaves and returned them to their own cities when he took over Babylon.

Alexander was no law giver such as Dariush the Great who established a uniform law system.

Alexander was in fact no different to many evil men of our world history, such as  Genghis Khan’.  And therefore if by  Great’ it is meant  Great Evil’, then historically we have many  Great leaders’ that we did not know about. !!

A lot has been said about his Great military battles.  It should not be forgotten that all great military nations and especially armies of the world have certain laws to follow in war and are as today vulnerable to sudden attacks and aggression such as terrorism and guerilla war.

What an organised army aims for, is strict order and civilised behaviour, and the well being of the nation and its population.

Alexander was never a good leader for his own country Macedonia, nor was he fighting a just war or a conventional war.  In fact he had surrounded himself with a gang of murderers.

All their battles with Iran were based on sudden raids, destruction and burning; and the next day a different location but more of the same.  They did not stay behind to take care of the sick and the dying.

It is natural that if a criminal kills a famous wealthy man he will get written about in newspapers, shown on television, and books written about him.  But it is not he who is Great but it is Greatness that he has destroyed.  I hope that this is not forgotten as so many times it is.

 

GREEK SLAVERY


 The major achievement of ancient Greece lies in the unshakeable belief in the worth of the individual person.”


That must be why they had slavery?


 Greek law, based on popular consent, aimed at improving conditions for all citizens.”


page 12

 Greece, the land and its people”

by Jim Antoniou, Macdonald Educational 1980.



Though no woman (who had no political rights), foreigner or slave could become a citizen.

The Greeks were a gang of barbarians in the sense that they allowed slavery, their women were treated as slaves, and they had no respect for other cultures or people who were not Greek.

Greek society relied heavily on slaves to supplement its labour force.  There was in fact no  society’, civilized as we know of.  There were slaves and masters.  And of course foreigners who were barbarians.

The Iranians’ achievement represented a significant step forwards for civilization.  To run such a vast domain, which had never existed before, they developed new, enlightened techniques for governing large areas and populations.  Before them the old empires such as the Assyrian's used brute power and terror to  control and rule over the masses.  Fear had become part of empire-building.  The Iranians alone broke that rule.  A rule that soon was forgotten in the coming age of Alexander, Roman, Arab and Mongol empires.

All the countries that came under the fold of the Iranian empire benefited economically and saw their living standards improve with peace and security that was guaranteed.  And stability that lasted and allowed for great building works to take place.  Human society had not seen such perfect administration and government before.

The Iranian empire was the civilizing force of the old world.

In the immortal words of one of its greatest kings of Hakamenesh: Dariush the Great who staunchly supported the rule of law, and not only for the powerful.

 So that the stronger does not smite nor destroy the weak.”  The Iranians were the only country in the known world that aspired and worked for universal rights of man.  And it had been for this reason that the founder of the Iranian empire, Kourash is rightly remembered in the book of  Jewish people the Old Testament as the  anointed one’

For the Iranian nation and its people, this civilising humanitarian attitude had been of no surprise.  For it had been more than five thousand years before the founder of the Great World Empire of the Hakamenesh, that the Great faith of Zarathustra was preached, and the proclamation of a single God practiced.  The belief system that guided the Jews and shaped the thinking of all monotheistic belief systems of the world from Christianity to Islam.

Zarathusthranism was the only religion of its time to speak of the righteous path, and to speak of the great struggle between Good And Evil.  In fact after eight thousand four hundred and seventy years, it is the oldest religion and the only one that  has not changed in its teachings or needed to do, so as it is still relevant for our age.  All other religions of the world have been lost and forgotten, for the single reason that their bore no significance for their new age.  Of course this is the test of truth.  The test of true religions of God.

In less than one thousand three hundred and seventy seven years of the existence of Islam, we see today that it has no relevance to the age and is incapable of progressing the life of those who believe in it.  To practice the Koran is suicide, as Afghanistan, Iran and Algeria are testimony to its destructive force.

The practice of the holy Avesta on the other hand brings enlightenment and peace to the believer and to fellow humans.

In the era  of the Hakamenesh Empire, as noted above, we had also had the Greek States (The term is difficult to use in this period of history (5772 AZ=141 BIE=700 - 6072 AZ=159 IE=400 BC) since  Greek” was and had been a term and an idea for the Athenians.  Apart from the Athenians hardly no other state believed or wanted such a creation.

And for this reason and many others the term was nonexistent as the term  Europe” was nonexistent in 5772 AZ=141 BIE=700 BC or in 6672 AZ=759 IE=200 AD.

However, I have used the term, in this essay, for ease of understanding as I feel to go in depth in explaining the misuse of the term would deter and confuse the reader, and for this reason alone I have used names and terms that the West is familiar with.

In their world, slavery was well developed and practiced and many of its leading intellectuals preached its  Great principles’.  The so called great thinkers of Greece have also justified it.

In fact they tell us that from Homeric times to Alexander, the practice had been common, and had a valuable and fundamental part in the economics and social life of Greece.

As a matter of fact, one can justly describe the Greek city states as slave societies, and with it a society of inequality, hardships, suffering, injustice, immorality, and discrimination.

Those who visit Greece of today and who might admire the classical buildings should know that they have been built by the suffering of thousands in slave labour and the wealth of other nations.

The attitudes, views and the society that existed cannot in anyway be called civilized.  Slavery, Prostitution, Homosexuality to name a few of the vices that existed in Greece were allowed, practiced and promoted.

On the other hand at the same period of history we have the Iranian society in which none of the above was allowed or practiced, and most certainly was not promoted.

The Greeks however do not stand condemned for their way of life or society.  But stand condemned for trying to force their form of society on other nations (Alexander) and teaching of such evil thought’s to the Romans, British, French and Americans.  Who if it had not been for the Greeks would probably not have had slavery and would probably not have viewed others as  barbarians’ a term used by ancient Greeks.

It had been mostly their justification for slavery, and its use and the need for slavery that shaped the minds of Western leaders and condemned million’s of Africans, Asians and Native Americans to a life of no value.

The matter of slavery has in most cases been overlooked and not mentioned by  Historians’.  This is no surprise since it does not fit into the picture of the  Greek Civilisation” which purportedly was a beacon for humanity.

Aristotle in his  Politics’ sees a slave as someone who belongs to his master completely, as an  animate piece of property’ and can be seen as a tool.  One obvious mark of being the property of another is that one may be bought and sold.

He like all Greeks saw that the slave and the free were different in that slaves were answerable with their bodies for their offenses, and were regularly whipped and were tortured legally.

Slaves have to do everything they are told, slaves have no birthrights, and do not belong in the society in which they are enslaved (whether they came to it as captives, bought property, or were bred there); rather, they remain permanently foreign,  outsiders’, having no social identity.

Slavery is unimaginable and the state of dishonour, unthinkable.  And it is this that Alexander offered the world and the Iranians-Brutality and Exploitation.

Those who where enslaved during adult life often had their previous identity formally removed in the process of sale: Stripped of clothing, former names, kin, nationality, and even their personality.

The Greeks had even phrased terms for slavery such as  Andrapodon’,  four-footed creature’, literally means  man-footed creature’ referring to a human being as an animal or a thing, to be bought and sold.

Other demeaning terms used where  Oikos’ (household),  Oiketes’ (houseboy),  Therapon’ (servant),  Akolouthos (follower),  Soma’ (body),  Anthropos (human being), suggesting that he or she is merely a human being with no further identity. 



And Pais (child, boy or girl) applied to slaves of any age.

Athenian plays of Athenaeus and Aristophanes justify  calling an old slave Pais, since like children  they need to be beaten’.

The regular beating of children and wives was normal behaviour for the Greeks and in their word for  beat’, one can see the connection clearly: Pais = boy Paiein = to beat.

Slaves were everywhere to be seen in Greek society.

Extended defence of slavery and even advice on how to select, train and manage slaves is given by Xenophon (6112 AZ=199 IE=360 BC), Aristotle in his book  of  Politics’, Plato in his  Laws’,and  Athenaeus in  Deipnosphistai’ (6672 AZ=759 IE=200 AD)(i.e  Intellectuals at Dinner’).

Homer’s poems(Odyssey) (5672 AZ=241 BIE=800 BC) thought to be fictional, never-the-less depict slaves of whose origins we hear were  war booty’, to be owned by the victors, or sold, or given as gifts.  It seems that in the Homeric period, the slaves were mainly Greek, and in Classical Greece foreigners.

In Greece free adult male citizens were distinguished from slaves: other Greek males, foreigners and women. The historian Theopompos (6072 AZ=159 IE=400 BC) and Thucydides, both speak of and mention Greek slavery.

All of the history of Greece shows slavery both approved of by the state.

In the Iranian empire, however, there is no mention of slavery by it’s historians or thinkers.  And it’s political leaders, such as Koroush the Great and Dariush the Great, fought for freedom and nations and awarded its citizens freedom and help in rebuilding their destroyed lives and homes,  as mentioned in the Old Testament, and the inscriptions and clay tablets of Iran and Babylon.

 

ALEXANDER THE ALCOHOLIC

He quenched his raging thirst with wine after coming out of fever:

 in the madness of his fever and in his thirst he drank wine excessively, and thereupon became delirious and died” (Aristobulus states according to Plutarch)

Also, the  king’s Journal’ (written record of Alexander’s acts day to day, compiled by Macedonians):

 today he slept after the drinking. and sometimes also the next day”.

The Macedonians drank hard liquor, their wine was without added water.  Alexander drank daily and spent part of the day sleeping.  And did so to the last days of his life.


The great empire has collapsed,

the seed of deceit has triumphed.

The ruler of Greece has taken seat,

our seat of Behesht (Paradise).

A boy of no grace, has taken our crown and grace.

Alexander is his name, disgrace is his end.

Poem on Alexander by Fraydon A.


HOW HE CONQUERED

Over imaginative guesses have been made about the remarkable feat of feeding so many men on the move so quickly through Iranian territory.

From victory to victory he was led on, by an open and well-stocked Royal Road.

The Iranian system allowed him, as he went, to feed himself quite easily.  Governors and resident nobles had long piled up huge reserves of grain and cattle for the people as a protection against famine.  One castle alone could feed an army for two years.

 

ALEXANDER THE SAVAGE

Hephaestion died in 6148 AZ=235 IE=324 BC after an over doses of alcohol.  Alexander proclaimed mourning throughout Asia and made provision for a funeral more lavish then any other.  During the campaign against the Cossaei, Alexander killed young Cossaeans as human sacrifices to his dead lover Hephaestion.

In his later years Alexander wished to be granted divine honours.  It appears from (the historian) Curtius that he made a request of the Macedonian’s and that it was rejected, Antipater (viceroy of Macedonia) was opposed to granting him divine honours after his death.

After his death the Macedonians at Babylon did not bestow upon him divine honours.

(He was a great king but not the greatest in opinion of Macedonians it appears).

 

WEDDINGS AT SUSA (political capital of Iran)

It is written that at Susa he held wedding ceremonies for  himself and his army.

He married three Iranian wives, Barsine, Parysatis, and Roxane according to Greek writers (apart from his hundreds of concubines!).

Also Drypetis to Hephaestion, Amastrine to Craterus, Artacama to Ptolemy and so on altogether ninety two bridegrooms.

All young women of the noblest Iranian blood.  Together, over ten thousand Macedonians soldiers married.

Now all this might sound all good for the (8472 AZ=2559 IE)1990’s in which intermarriage is propagated.  However, the one’s who do so are not the conquered or forced to do so.   The decision to do so, is entirely theirs.

And even in this age we still have communities and countries that consider this act illegal and against religion such as the Jews.  But more importantly over two thousand  years ago when Alexander conquered Iran, he  ordered his men to marry Iranian women.  The Iranians had and still do have strict laws of marriage. Among the categories of a suitable partner were race, religion, and class.  To which neither Alexander nor his men belonged.

It was perceived to be a very bad omen for anyone to break these laws.  And it was into this culture and customs that Alexander married Iranian women, taking into consideration also that most of them already had partners and were married.

In effect this was an act of  rape, humiliation and disrespect to a culture, and to the religion and pride of Iranian womanhood.  The strict law of the Zarathushtrian religion permitted marriage to one wife only.

Many rapists of today also consider their act as being with the woman’s consent.  And the Macedonians or Greeks must have fought this vile act of marriage.

No nationality in the world, would want it’s beautiful daughters, to be given to the foreign occupying forces?

And what women would want to marry a foreign army that has murdered her people, her king, her priest, her father, brother and mother and has devastated her country?

These are only a few questions that arise from the sad episode of Iranian history in Alexander's time.   How easily crimes are white washed and even made too sound like unifying acts and so on.

 

ALEXANDER'S ACHIEVEMENTS

Like much else that is told of Alexander, including the omens that supposedly preceded and attended his birth, are the inventions of the overactive imagination, of the lying Greek nature, and over exaggeration of the events.

Ayatollah Khomenie in coming too power in Iran (8451 AZ=2538 IE=1979 AD - 8461 AZ=2548 IE=1989 AD) renamed all of previous regimes achievements and cities with his own names.

We know he had no part building these cities or contributing in any way to these cities or sites or roads.

All evil men are principally destructive (and very much the opposite of good leaders who are constructive for their country), and  ironically when taking power they attribute all the good deeds to themselves and their cause, in the hope that as time passes people will forget and actually believe that they had a part in building the country and contributing to its civilisation.

 

CITIES RENAMED

Such as: Shah Pour Harbour to Imam Khomenie Harbour, Sepah Square to Imam Khomenie Square, Mosque Shah to Mosque Imam Khomenie, Sepah Street to Imam Khomenie Street, Homuin City to Khomenie City, Bozorgrah-e Shahyad to Bozorgrah-e Ayatollah, Takht-e-Jamsheed Street to Ayatollah Taleghani Street etc. (and including many hospitals, monuments and other constructions).

And at the time of Alexander we see the same: The so-called cities that had been founded by Alexander in reality, simply had their names changed; for example, Rayy became Europos, Susa became Eulaios, Hammadan became Epiphaneia, Shahr-i Qumis became Hecatompylos, Mithradakirt became Nysa,  Farah became Prophthasia and so on.   There are some that had been named directly after him, such as Alexandropolis which was Shahr Korush, Alexandria was Abadan, Alexandria was Arya and so forth.

All evil doers of history seem to act the same: one day in power and they wish to make believe that they had built the whole country.  For Alexander and the idea that he built seventy cities, in less than twelve years (of that he was in battle from the beginning to the end) is not just ridiculous but outright laughable and amazing that anyone could possibly believe such outrageous lies.

Just because the Greeks have renamed seventy towns or cities'  Alexandropolis” is no evidence that he founded the cities or built them,  the latter being impossible, unless one believes he was actually God!



 What distinguishes Alexander from all other conquerors is his divine mission”.


 Alexander the Great’

N.G.L. Hammond

1987 London


Apart from building not cities, he destroyed those that existed, such as Susa, Takht-e-Jamsheed and Ecbatana, the three capital cities of ancient Iran.

The most blatant example of this tactic of lying was the renaming of Takht-e-Jamsheed to  Perseptolis’’ (which literally means  Destroyer of Cities’).   Takht-e-Jamsheed’ when translate into English means literally the  Seat of Jamsheed’, while on the other hand the Greek name which the West has adopted when referring to the site is a deliberate mistranslation from the poet Aeschylus. (From that name has come  Persepolis’, a corruption of the Greek by which the Palace has commonly, though incorrectly, been known ever since.)  Therefore it is not only a wrong name for the Palaces of Kings of Iran but an insult to the history of Iran and the site.  It has been the Greeks the enemies of Iran who have given it such a name as they have also given other misleading names such as  Persia’.  Persia is the name of a province (i.e Pars, Fars,) and a tribe (i.e. Persian), and not the name of the country (i.e Iran, derived from the generic word;  Aryan’ used to describe the race of the country).  In the holy Avesta compiled more than eight thousand years ago the name of the country is recorded as  Iran Veaje’. (Vendidad, Fargard 1:  The first of the good lands and countries which I, AhuraMazda, created, was the Iran Veaje, by the Vanguhi Daitya.”)

 

GREEK ACHIEVEMENTS?

Achievements of others are still, even today attributed to the unworthy Greeks.

Most Greeks lived lives of poverty, slavery and violence.  Their civilization was something the world could do well without.

In fact the ills of today's Western society can be attributed to them:  Heavy drinking, homosexuality, alcoholism, and a willingness to have fun at the expense of leading citizens, the Gods, and even sacred ceremonies such as portrayed in the plays of Aristophanes (6024 AZ=111 IE=448 - 6134 AZ=221 IE=380 BC).

He (the Greek  Civilization’) crushed and dismembered his enemies, as the Romans  did in his footsteps.  He exploited, enslaved and destroyed the native people he conquered, as the West has done in America and Africa.

The breakup of the Empire by Alexander was his lasting achievement.  He  was unable to keep together the different nations, a task that the Iranians achieved for around four hundred years.  He destroyed the only empire that had created a world community capable of living internally at peace to which to this day the modern world is lacking.

Does it seem justified to make him a hero for his actions, especially as he spent them all in war, and had no policy or government established, apart from breaking all rules of law?

How scholarly is this approach to history?

Scholars of Ancient history should complain why so much is written about Alexander, a lone figure in the sea of history.

 

Return to top

BACK

TOP OF PAGE

FORWARD


[ © Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 Fraydon Aryan. All rights reserved.  ][ Terms of Service & Use  ]